[ad_1]
Bylykbashi: We still can not stabilize the elections. As now 20 years ago the first commission was convened between the majority and the opposition. In 2000 the first Electoral Code was made unilaterally. The majority at that time did not take into account the interests of the opposition, then decided alone how it wanted the rules for the elections. It is probably in the few commissions that deal with the real part of the opposition. In 2002 it was decided to do by consensus the change of the code followed for 10 years. After 10 years we have not managed to do that anymore. Even the attempt of the political council, you did not succeed.
Here we have the document before us, the changes of October 5 that killed the agreement, if this is the model that this commission will work
So what is agreed upon is what it stands for, otherwise we make fun of the voters. It is among the rare commissions so large, 18 members. This commission needs to be efficient, but with all the representatives of the parties, big and small. Experts should represent real expertise. Unfortunately, in my judgment, I see it as photocopying from one commission to another. The veto derives from that of 2002, but it was real. It seems that the mechanism of this commission is not real. You have made the OSCE ODIHR recommendations as your object of work. We must emphasize today that the whole community must turn its attention to the recommendations. These are recommendations that point out that fundamental principles are being violated, such as the secrecy of the ballot and freedom of the vote, which means that elections are not democratic. This reform in any case can not be a Bazaar, unfortunately, should not be like the end of 2020, where a Bazaar not only changed the Code but destroyed an electoral system. The rules of the game are not changed unilaterally. We have to work today to set the rules of the game for the voters. It’s better not to start than to take us back, 20 years gone.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
