[ad_1]
Fatmir Xhafa’s criticism of the resolution prepared by Damian Gjiknuri for the High Judicial Council was not well received by the drafter of the document. The two socialists did not spare their stings to each other, who had their target somewhere else.
Xhafaj: We articulate one thing in certain political judgments and another in resolutions. Because if we say that we have some concerns about the proportionality in the investigations and trials by the JJKKO, we have no other place to say it, it was precisely this resolution. It is understood that this is not in the interest or to fatten it in the interest of the work, but it is simply a political rhetoric for other reasons.
Breastfeeding: The good thing would be that since he himself would bring them in writing, it would be normal that they are more semantics, ways of interpreting sentences.
Pandeli Majko tried to extinguish the appearance of the two socialists, giving a signal with his elbow to Damia Gjiknuri who was by his side, but the veteran socialist’s effort did not stop the retorts between the colleagues
Breastfeeding: I always say my thoughts, but the important thing is that no one should start from the difficulties of implementation. We have chosen a model, which has difficulties.
Xhafaj: E the only thing we haven’t had is the high council of the Prosecution. The only institution in the architecture of the system, and I don’t understand whether the high council of the prosecution has coclaved this architecture or not.
The clash within the species did not leave indifferent the democrats who followed the debate in the role of spectator.
Chupi: This is an individual supremacy battle. They are matters of internal conflicts of the SP that you bring to the Laws Commission
Bushka: Internal or external conflicts, refer your problem to your party. We are clear with each other, that even when we have opposite opinions, we respect each other, we do not divide the party in two!
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
