[ad_1]
The isolation of Emiliano Shullazi in the ’41 Bis’ regime is valid and stands, but the process conducted against him in the GJKKO Appeal violated his fundamental constitutional rights. This was the reasoning of the Constitutional Court regarding Shullazi’s appeal against the decision for his stay in solitary confinement.
According to the Constitution, “Shullazi’s rights to due process of law were violated” related to the non-review of secret acts on the basis of which the Ministry of Justice decided to take him to a special regime of isolation, and for their review the court refused to do so arguing that this is a secret.
It should be noted that the Constitutional decision has no consequences, while Shullazi will continue to stay in the special regime ’41 Bis’.
Since last September, Emiliano Shullazi has appealed to the Constitutional Court against the decision on his stay in the “41 bis” isolation regime. Shullazi’s appeal to the Constitutional Court comes after the GJKKO Appeal rejected his claims to leave this strict security regime. From August 1, 2021 Emiliano Shullazi’s gang, but also Arbjon Aliko and Genci Balla are in isolation cells.
After 83 court hearings in two years, the Special Court of Appeals sentenced Emiliano Shullazi and his group to 55 years in prison. Under the accusation of fining and creating a structured criminal group, Emiliano Shullazi was sentenced to 14 years in prison, while Gilmando Danin, Endrit Qyqja to 10 years, Indrit Zela to 10 years and Blerim Shullazi to 9 years in prison were sentenced to 12 years in prison.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
