[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
For 5 years a citizen’s bank account had been blocked by the prosecution for verifying income that had been deposited in America.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Meanwhile, the FBI had ruled that the $ 180,000 was clean, but the account was under seizure. After paying 7 thousand euros, the decision to lift the seizure is finally executed.<\/p>\n
<\/em>A citizen from Has, has denounced in the show Fiks Fare, the lawyer Alma Halili, who according to him has received 7000 euros to unlock the 175,000 dollars that the denouncer had sent together with his relatives, cousin for the opening of a business in Tirana. The lawyer asked for 7000 euros with the intention that she would give it to the prosecutor and the judge of the case, while for herself she had asked for 45,000 lek\u00eb.<\/p>\n According to Ardian Cenalis\u00eb, \u201cI and some cousins \u200b\u200bfirst went to Nurija (cousin)’s account to open a business. Six years ago, the money was blocked by the prosecution to verify where it came from. Since most of the money came from America, the Tirana prosecutor’s office asked the FBI for help in investigating, and after the investigation it turned out that the money had been earned legally. But during the investigations carried out by the Albanian Prosecution and the trial, I was obliged to get a lawyer. So I got in touch with lawyer Alma Halili with whom I also had frequent contacts. The last contact with the lawyer was with a Canadian phone number, where she was able to talk to me more freely and told me explicitly. Listen to Ardian that I can not speak Albanian numbers. The case has been dismissed, but to issue the execution order we have to make a payment of 7 thousand euros. According to her, she would give this money to the prosecutor and the judge. I’m a realtor told me, I’m the middleman trying to fix things for you. My payment told me it is 450,000 old lek\u00eb. Several times I have told Alma, these 7 thousand euros that I will pay, it is true that you will make it possible for me to unlock the money. He told me I will not do it, but the prosecutor will do it together with the judge of the case. In those moments I saw that something was wrong here. That is why I addressed Fiks Fare “, Ardiani confesses.<\/p>\n In cooperation with the journalists of Fiks, in the presence of the latter, he gave the lawyer Alma Halili once 5 thousand euros and another time 2 thousand. In all the meetings that the complainant and the journalists of Fiks had with the lawyer Halili, she said that she asked for this money for the prosecutor and the judge of the case to unlock the blocked money. All this situation has been going on for 6 years and still this account has not been unlocked. “In the discussion I had with Ms. Alma, I told her she would contact the SPAK, she directly told me it is not a bad opinion, but here is Albania, not England or other countries that have a clear law of justice. If you continue with SPAK, it will take another 4-5 years. Choose only he told me or pay 7 thousand euros or wait another 5 years “says the denouncer.<\/p>\n After the denunciation of Cenalija, the journalists of Fiks Fare started the investigation where they first met the lawyer Alma Halili near the Tirana Prosecutor’s Office. In one of the meetings, the lawyer made it clear to reporters that she had spoken to Ardian and that he should give her 7,000 euros to give to the judge and prosecutor of the case to enable the issuance of an execution order and on the condition that not to appeal the dismissal decision. After the first meeting in Tirana, the lawyer requested that the second meeting be held in Durr\u00ebs, where she would initially receive the amount of 5000 euros, so as not to appear a liar according to her to the prosecutor and the judge. He would then receive another 2,000 euros to make up for a total of 7,000 euros. The second amount of 2000 euros to lawyer Halili was handed over to Mr. Cenalia together with a journalist of Fiks.<\/p>\n After paying the amount of 7000 euros, the lawyer Halili guaranteed that within two weeks she would make the whitewashed decision of the execution of the decision. And so it happened, after two weeks the lawyer Alma Halili submits to the denouncer the decision to lift the seizure of the bank account.<\/p>\n The first day, journalists meet lawyer Alma Halili.<\/p>\n Lawyer – She received a lawyer and made this request to terminate the investigation since it has been proven that we are not dealing with a criminal offense.<\/p>\n Fiction – What did the prosecutor ask for from the beginning, did he ask for dismissal?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Requested leave. Along with the leave, he would also request the lifting of the sequestration.<\/p>\n Fiction – Did not ask?<\/p>\n Lawyer – He did not ask.<\/p>\n Fiction – Does the prosecutor keep his word? Do you trust him?<\/p>\n Lawyer – That’s okay, yes, yes.<\/p>\n Fiction – Not to appeal?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes, yes. We are worried that we will not go to appeals or things. I was worried about him. That these people usually want rents ahead. Money is out of the question.<\/p>\n Fiction – Now the decision when we make it to tell him?<\/p>\n Lawyer – For us 15 days from today 16 days that depends on how it is.<\/p>\n Fiction- – The problem is here that he has asked for leave, will he appeal for leave again?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes. We have the holiday in hand and we told him to issue the order, no. They are castile things.<\/p>\n Fiction – I brought 2000 pounds to convert to bring them tomorrow morning or how do you tell us? Unless we ruin your job?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Tomorrow morning I am at the Civil Court at the exhibition and there is no problem, we can call. Tomorrow there is no problem.<\/p>\n Fiction 2 – How much did you leave with Ardian?<\/p>\n Lawyer – In the beginning we had talked to Ardian for 5 thousand euros. Then they asked again, again.<\/p>\n Fixed 2 – 10 (thousand euros)?<\/p>\n Lawyer – 7 thousand euros.<\/p>\n Fiction 2 – He is taking this money in vain without any connection. Because I know that the FBI has brought a letter that this money is clean and is not a crime money.<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes.<\/p>\n The second meeting with the lawyer, receiving the money<\/p>\n Fiction – To be correct that he told us yesterday for 7000, he gave us 5000<\/p>\n Lawyer – All right, all right, no problem at all. To go show that I am correct, then others will come himself.<\/p>\n Fix Associate – This money is a gift from family members.<\/p>\n Lawyer – You have no one to explain it to, $ 180,000. The law does not, we are in Albania, here is the problem.<\/p>\n Fiks’s collaborator – He explained to me very well, this money is from brother to sister from all the people in his family, it is a gift. Ask for 7000 euros.<\/p>\n Fiction – Who is the prosecutor, judge, at least I know? You counted to be in your pocket, not to be in my pocket please.<\/p>\n Fix Collaborator – To be correct do you understand?<\/p>\n Fiction – See if you are closer (the journalist addresses the lawyer’s spouse) .1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10<\/p>\n Lawyer – When will I close this problem and save you.<\/p>\n Fiction – Count to be halal exactly.<\/p>\n Lawyer – I was worried in Canada that I had paid them out of pocket and I had done the work and then we had finished them back. I was pretty sorry I went to Canada.<\/p>\n Fiction – Counted to be fixed.<\/p>\n Lawyer – You are fine (after counting the money).<\/p>\n Fix Fellow – One more thing he asked, get Ardian on the phone now.<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes<\/p>\n Fix Collaborator – Let’s tell you we have everything ok.<\/p>\n Fiction – And to confirm it.<\/p>\n Lawyer – (Talks to the complainant). Hello how are you. All right, yes, you also come from the week, we meet and talk. He had given the money and I did not know anything.<\/p>\n Fiks’s collaborator – Ardiani is right<\/p>\n Lawyer – No fault<\/p>\n Fix Fellow – The money was legal<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes<\/p>\n Fiction – The prosecutor had nothing to do then why keep them? (blocked money)<\/p>\n Lawyer – Why do you keep them ?!<\/p>\n Fiction -Because we do not want to talk, because it was appealing\u2026<\/p>\n Lawyer – We do not have\u2026<\/p>\n Fix Associate – Who hinders this work judge or prosecutor now I do not understand?<\/p>\n Lawyer’s husband – Both were originally made together. Then one left, the other came, they appealed and returned, give here and there, do knej, they changed and do it again for the second time.<\/p>\n Lawyer – Who lowered us, who lowered our prosecutor in conversations.<\/p>\n Fix Associate – Has the prosecutor or judge changed?<\/p>\n Lawyer – The judge who sat the prosecutor in the conversations has changed and kept our file there. That I had the head of the prosecution the bride of a friend and we could not stop her. Is my file what you want?<\/p>\n Fiction – Did not accept it?<\/p>\n Lawyer – The head of the prosecution and the prosecutor did not accept.<\/p>\n Fiction – It’s been five years, brother, it’s been five years.<\/p>\n Lawyer – Five years is as much as you want. They are frozen and nothing can be taken for granted.<\/p>\n Fiski – How is it possible that the frozen money does not receive the percentage?<\/p>\n Fix Associate – The FBI is leaking it<\/p>\n Lawyer – I agree with you, what will we do, we will sue and say we held them unfairly or not, but that trial ends for another 100 years and you still have it negative. They put you in prison and as a result, after two years in prison, they say you are innocent and you say keep me in prison without guilt, give me the money. You will never get that money.<\/p>\n Fiction – The same prosecutor is?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes, that’s why we’re here. To us if he had changed, he would not have submitted the file.<\/p>\n Third meeting with the lawyer<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Where is the work left?<\/p>\n Lawyer – We are not waiting for the appeal deadline to expire.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – How long do you want it to be?<\/p>\n Lawyer – On Monday or Tuesday we make the decision. 15 days because we had that cramp<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Yes<\/p>\n Lawyer – He clarified very quickly that we took that decision with a photo, it was clarified very quickly. I left it for a couple of days because we had not heard about that issue. Even today I went, keep aside (money) because I do not want to be late, what I need I told him we have everything aside (he points with his fingers for money) what you will do.<\/p>\n Denouncer – Yes. yes. Did they get the money or\u2026?<\/p>\n Lawyer – They took 5 (thousand euros), now they are 2 (thousand euros) if we take them and take them. Even today I was told without worries 2 (thousand euros) that I have left I will bring we also have worries. So there is nothing more to say.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – We talked on the phone with that Canadian number, do you understand me?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes<\/p>\n Whistleblower – I also always know that it is only for 5 (thousand euros)<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes, that’s why I spoke to you in Canada. We talked about 7 (thousand euros). When I was in Canada that 5 (thousand euros) we knew.<\/p>\n The complainant – Now 5 (thousand euros) judge or prosecutor?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Take them both and kill themselves together. That he fixed it for us.<\/p>\n The complainant – 2000 (euro) that I have to give today?<\/p>\n Lawyer – We will give it to them again. They received 5 (thousand euros) and 2 (thousand euros) that much.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – I mean they got it safe is not no dance, maybe ..<\/p>\n Lawyer – No, no, I have them in my hand<\/p>\n Lawyer’s husband – Absolutely.<\/p>\n The complainant – Did you give it to the judge or the prosecutor?<\/p>\n Lawyer – We did those jobs.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Is he the same judge or has he changed?<\/p>\n Lawyer – So he has changed.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Judge \u00eb?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Made the decision, made it and made it very quickly.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Since I gave him another 2000 euros<\/p>\n Lawyer – All right, we’ll get them<\/p>\n The complainant – Are you not saying that I want another 2000 euros, brother?<\/p>\n Lawyer – When, when does he say that he would have said it if we say it. On Monday, Tuesday, we have the decision in hand.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Do you have the FBI decision?<\/p>\n Lawyer – It has been investigated and it turned out so, so, so\u2026<\/p>\n Whistleblower – But this 2000 that I will give today, who will take it?<\/p>\n Lawyer – They again, they.<\/p>\n The denouncer – 7000 euros are taken by these two big coders.<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes<\/p>\n The complainant – The prosecutor with the judge?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes, they both.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – Even if he sees the grace.<\/p>\n Lawyer’s husband – They did not play the mind, I believe he is so calm.<\/p>\n Fiction – You are now left to pay the lawyer as well.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – I first talked about 450,000 lek\u00eb (old). He told me no dollars, no euros<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes<\/p>\n Whistleblower – I then asked you Alma how much does your job’s revenge?<\/p>\n Lawyer – Yes.<\/p>\n The complainant – 450 000 ALL (old)<\/p>\n Fiction – Count these too.<\/p>\n Whistleblower – 1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19.20, 1000 you are OK<\/p>\n Lawyer – Let me count them too.<\/p>\n Denouncer – It is sevap we say from Hasi, I have to count them twice.<\/p>\n Fiction – Are 20 okay?<\/p>\n Lawyer – To sign. (counts another 1000 euros with 100 denominations)<\/p>\n Whistleblower – 2000 (euro)<\/p>\n Lawyers – 2000 (euro)<\/p>\n \n<\/p>\n top channel
\n<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n