[ad_1]
Milan was eliminated from the Italian Cup in the semifinals, while the “red and blacks” of Italy were canceled a goal in the meeting that ended with the result 3-0 for Inter.
Was Kalulus’s position in that goal influential?
Despite the fact that the goal was canceled by the referee and was seen as the fairest decision, according to Italian media reports, that realization has sparked a series of discussions and to decide whether or not to cancel the goal, Kalulu’s influence on the possibility should be assessed. of Handanovic to have the ball to stop the ball.
The case can have many interpretations, however it is obvious that the player of the “red and blacks” tends to leave the trajectory as much as possible, in order not to hinder Handanovic.
Marian’s decision came after a careful evaluation and after a dialogue between him and the VAR hall, who believed that they were making the right decision and by a part of the arbitrators in Italy, according to the reports of “Sportmediaset” that decision can not be considered as wrong, but emphasize that in the end it is all a matter of interpretation.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
