[ad_1]
The Anti-Corruption Unit of the Minister of Justice and the State Advocacy, have asked the SPAK to take Judge Klorinda Çela as a defendant, as they say that she has given ‘one of the most flagrant openly illegal decisions in scandalous opposition to the public interest, a little days before Vetting ousted him from the justice system ‘.
The Minister of Justice has called on the SPAK to launch a property investigation of Judge Klorinda Çela:
“Openly contrary to the law has blocked a serious investment of the Albanian government, one of the objectives of justice reform was for those judges removed from vetting who have inconsistencies between income and wealth, to go to the SPAK and the Court to receive justice , to date it has not happened, no one has been punished by justice, if we do not count Llalla. This is a request not only of the people, but also of the US-EU.
I am with the state attorney, to inform the public about a scandalous case of abuse of office as a judge, Judge K.Ç, in the civil court of Tirana has left written in the form of a call from justice the decision to take the children of the capital and with their children, which the government has promised a new center, with a puppet theater, at the entrance of Lake Tirana, at the Republic Guard, the relocation of the guard and the opening for children and the library, it is a state plot , project ideas have been prepared for its beginning, but Judge K.Ç had a different opinion, when the ministry gets ready to start work, the state property becomes a burden. the plaintiff in excess of what is exceeded by law requires security measures until it is thoroughly reviewed, against was the state bar, the council of ministers, the ministry of culture, the court did not review the request, set as November 18, 2021, for development normal session where the ministry of culture would be convened, the judge informed everyone about this date, while they were getting ready for this session, on 21.10.2021 the court had a decision to secure a lawsuit without the parties.
It is not judged that it was a hasty decision without the presence of the parties, in this logic no new fact occurred that would justify the haste of the decision, the parties were preparing by gathering evidence and facts, they are facing a decision without their presence, this absurd happened when the judge was going to vetting, who finally fired her for not justifying the property. So, it is announced by the KPC that it would enter into vetting, as soon as it became aware, it hurries and on 21.10.2021, so the day before it decided unilaterally, to obtain lawsuit insurance violating the state, its actions performed a week before to be fired by vettigu, for us are openly taken according to the principle, catch some catch, the anti-corruption unit, and the state attorney’s request the SPAK to immediately begin investigations into this judge who has given a flagrant decision, contrary to law, scandalous in the public interest“.
Vijon…
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
