[ad_1]
Arjan Ndoja was vetted only by professional figures and skills, for which he was considered by the CISD with inadequate links to crime and decisions influenced by business.
The name of Aleksandër Lahos was brought to you as proof, in other words, the rum that was found in the same car with which he was traveling in 2019 Ndoja, when he was assassinated and his driver Andi Maloku was injured. But Arjan Ndoja objected by asking for evidence and wiretaps that prove the contacts with people of the crime, after the prosecutor for Rrum said that he had no information about his past. Ndoja accused that from the car from where he came out injured, no missing files were found, but private files of a lawyer, about which he had told the driver who was killed in the assassinations.
Earlier during the written submission, the prosecutor said that this assassination was due to pressure from the executive.
Question: Did you say something about the assassination?
Arjan Ndoja: The assassination continues to be under investigation
For one of the citizens who investigated Arjan Ndoja said that he had direct contacts with the Prime Minister, giving answers to the IOM for inappropriate connections but also to the head of government who accused him two years ago.
Pto show pressure during these investigations Ndoja recalled the former deputy prime minister’s visit to the hall where he was representing the state prosecution in court.
“I did not accuse, but I defended myself”– he said.
But the prosecutor received the harshest reply from the international observer Theo Jacobs who stated that he would not want a prosecutor like Arjan Ndoja in the team. In the end, Ndoja left the vetting room under the company of bodyguards that after the assassination, the state made him available to save his life. the chances of him passing the process are slim.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
