[ad_1]
The first round ends in five minutes and it is quite clear what lies behind. We did our job, we participated in the process, the reasoning is quite simple. This majority has no legitimacy to elect a president and give a neutral president over the parties. Our position is clear. We have made an official statement with a simple logic, to be a consensual and credible process. The president must be elected in the first three rounds to be credible and by consensus with all parties. We have been waiting for the position that the majority will hold on our proposal. It will never have to be elected in the fourth and fifth rounds as it has to be elected with 71 votes and this can be done by the government alone. This process is open to attitudes.
Will you bring names?
Not because there will have to be such a process. It would be the shame of parliament. We have a set of criteria. One of the requirements I have said is do not expect us to do a dark room process because they are bargains. It should be done in the eyes of the public with open cards.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link