[ad_1]
Ervin Salianji declares against the head of the parliamentary group of PD, Enkelejd Alibeaj, who the day before said that he will not participate in the plenary session where the next president of the republic will be voted.
Harsh towards Alibeaj, Salianji writes in a Facebook post, that he is boycotting the parliament elected by the people while he sat cross-legged with the elected by Rama!
“Decisions without holding previous group meetings are individual decisions, any decision announced without group discussions, without debate and without collegial decision-making is null! Every function is not private property, each of us represents the citizens!
There is no maneuver that can cover the political responsibility for the failure, we do not have to sit with Rama always to always say how dirty he was! ”- writes Salianji, among others.
Full post:
Boycotts the parliament elected by the people while sitting cross-legged with the elected by Rama!
Boycotts have had devastating consequences for the Democratic Party! We are in this situation from those who use politics thinking that they would benefit from a boycott.
Decisions without holding group meetings before are individual decisions, any decision announced without group discussions, without debate and without collegial decision-making is null! Every function is not private property, each of us represents the citizens!
There is no maneuver that can cover the political responsibility for the failure, we do not have to sit with Rama always to always say how dirty he was!
It is murderous naivety and non-political rage to leave the institutions out of anger that “did not give you a bargain” but were used! How can a boycott be proposed, a typical Eastern way when as a party we fight in the name of Western values!
I warned him at the beginning of the process that Rama had sealed the candidate in an envelope and would take it out at the end as it happened.
I insisted that the Democratic Party not bargain at non-institutional tables but sit only and only if the illegitimate majority gave the right to propose only to the opposition!
Today, after that bargaining negotiation failed, does the public have the right to think that everything was done for personal interests?
Is there a citizen who can give him an explanation of how the Democratic Party gives him a quorum and participates in the 5-minute sessions where the rounds without candidates were burned and where the quorum had to be 84 deputies!
How can it be explained that Rama gave you what he did not have and today a boycott and non-participation in the session is required to harm the opposition in the eyes of the public!
It is unacceptable to ask all the deputies to boycott the parliament while the only boycott should have been to sit at the informal table of Rama and his elected representatives!
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
