[ad_1]
Constitutionalist Aurela Anastasi, invited to the Open studio tonight, spoke about the decision of the Constitutional Court not to dismiss Meta.
Anastasis sees this decision as absurd as it is not based on arguments.
“I am very unclear that I do not know how the Court gave this decision. Is it an abbreviated decision? Maybe, but he does not say. The Constitutional Court should set an example for other courts. We do not have a reasoned decision. We can reason as we please. We do not have before the arguments of the Constitutional Court. The decision must be declared reasoned. That this is not a decision that came urgently. Even the court itself does not know when it will give its decision. He says it will be given according to the legal deadlines “she said.
We recall that the Constitutional Court decided not to dismiss President Ilir Meta.
In its notification, the Constitutional Court explains that “after verifying the procedure followed by the Assembly for the establishment of the commission of inquiry, guaranteeing the right of the President to be heard and defended and taking into account the organizational independence of the Assembly, in the whole ascertained that there was no constitutional violation during this procedure ”.
During the process, the legal advisers of the Head of State relied in particular on their defense, precisely on the serious violations that, according to them, had been committed by the parliament from the moment of reviewing the request of the deputies that set the parliament in motion, until decision.
On the other hand, the violations alleged by the representatives of the socialist majority, for the Constitutional Court can not be considered as serious violations of the Constitution.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
