[ad_1]
SPAK has been filled with 17 prosecutors, but for the last two places where she was a competitor and Sonila Muhametaj, the prosecutor requests the zero declaration of the appointment of Elvin Gokaj and Alfred Shehu, because according to the accuser they did not receive the points with merit.
The High Prosecution Council has ended up indicted in the Administrative Court for the way it has listed several prosecutors before the SPAK. Former crime prosecutor Sonila Muhametaj demands the intervention of the court to overturn a decision of the KLP that did not qualify her from the competition and demands her appointment to the SPAK.
The process of appointments in SPAK reminds the prosecutor should be open, while two members of KLP according to the plaintiff are in conflict of interest and should have resigned. Because Sonila Muhametaj insists that he or their relatives were under investigation. Comparing with colleagues Shehu and Gokaj, she recalls not only the volume of files she has investigated, but also the parameters required to rise in her career at SPAK.
One of the winners, according to Muhametaj, was classified by the KLP as a violation of the Constitution, as he did not meet the condition of professional ability. As for the other, according to the prosecutor’s lawsuit, KLP did not go deeper and did not receive information from the Elbasan Prosecutor’s Office on how it had investigated while “the winning prosecutor of SPAK had some incorrect attitudes after being asked by the media for evidence on the murder of Pjerin Xhuvani”, says Sonila Muhametaj.
The prosecutor even accuses the HCJ of being on the verge of abuse of office.
Throwing strong doubts about the real reasons for the ranking, Sonila Muhametaj tells the court that the council unjustly appointed her two colleagues.
In a lawsuit that questions the access of this institution, the prosecutor asks the court to reopen the competition and rank 3 candidates according to law and meritocracy.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
