[ad_1]
Kreshnik Spahiu does not believe in an impartial Constitutional Court at a time when, according to him, four judges have been appointed by President Ilir Meta.
In the Open studio on skype, Spahiu said that we did not have a transparent process. He added that there is a conflict of interest because 4 of the judges have been appointed by Meta.
“Albania has 32 years to establish a rule of law and I am convinced that it will take another 32 years for an Albanian judge to sentence a President or a politician. The processes of judging a President take 200-300 years. Simple directors, fired every day. This process had to set a bar, a very high transparent standard. Who Albanian today can say that this was a model process? None. Even today it is said that it was an unreasonable decision. There are some statements that the Court showed that it was independent, but how can it be independent when half were elected by Ilir Meta?
The trial was to be public. The process is allowed with journalists and cameras. The decision can be neither unreasonable nor abbreviated, they have postponed the hearing 10 times. The parties had to be present. Half of them have been in conflict of interest. 4 were appointed by Ilir Meta. There is a conflict of interest here. How can it be a court with standards when in the last months 4 of them have been employed by Ilir Meta “said Spahiu.
We recall that the Constitutional Court decided not to dismiss President Ilir Meta.
In its notification, the Constitutional Court explains that “after verifying the procedure followed by the Assembly for the establishment of the commission of inquiry, guaranteeing the right of the President to be heard and defended and taking into account the organizational independence of the Assembly, in the whole ascertained that there was no constitutional violation during this procedure ”.
During the process, the legal advisers of the Head of State relied in particular on their defense, precisely on the serious violations that, according to them, had been committed by the parliament from the moment of reviewing the request of the deputies that set the parliament in motion, until decision.
On the other hand, the violations alleged by the representatives of the socialist majority, for the Constitutional Court can not be considered as serious violations of the Constitution.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
