[ad_1]
While the SP proposed May 23, for the second round of voting in parliament for the President, Grida Duma said that the majority should vote or reject a name of the opposition from Thursday in the parliamentary session.
“Even as long as it lasts, it is a farce. Process with criteria. The criteria can be set by anyone. I go by logic, more to speed up the process, do it on Thursday. Come up with a name from the opposition, and oppose it if you want. If we come and say you have no legitimacy, we are out of concept. Speed up the process, because I personally consider a first, second, third or third process a facade “ said the Duma.
In response, Minister Spiropali, part of the negotiating troika of the majority, said that first the opposition should agree among themselves and then ask for a table with the majority.
“Alibeaj says something, Duma says something else, not to mention what Mediu said, which made sense and was reasonable. First agree, what you want from us.
You stayed away from this process, you only started letters, even the vague ones, opposed by one member or another. You talked about the challenge from old, squalid people, but you did not say how you will challenge this scoundrel, taking responsibility before your constituents. You have no obligation to us to come to the conference. You owe it to those who voted for you. Since we are also talking about processes and wills. Letters do not replace processes, We have the will to do this process with you.
Date 23 is a reasonable date. And the 30th is also the maximum deadline, this shows that we are open for both the process and the names. We do not intend to make fun of it, we need names that can get 20 signatures and can be voted. This is our goal. We have the right to propose names, the constitution gives it to us.
Our mandates are legitimate, this is a legitimate government, this parliament is legitimate. To talk about this process, come up with names that represent this process.
Now let’s break away from this way, this kind of model, and give the country a president. We sit down when you want as you want, you propose we propose and we agree. Said Spiropali.
But while Spiropali sought agreement among the opposition, Alibeaj considered the opposing stances as an expression of free thought.
“Do you agree with each other? It seems strange to you that you are used to the culture of the garrison, you even put the names for president in the envelope. But do not be surprised try to understand this as well. Yes, there may be free opinions different from the opposition. Understand one thing, the common denominator. If I sent you a letter, I did not set conditions, it is our position. We want some moral criteria.
We will select the president to be of the Albanians. And for those who aspire should know, do they give these attitudes to accept people who have created their public profile or want scenes. We have said this, we know very well you have 71 votes and you can hardly wait for the 4th and 5th round. It is our obligation to contribute. Publicly listen to people know what values we are for. Whoever listens to these criteria, is the orientation of how we will synthesize our vote. In envelopes, in dark rooms, I’m sorry you do not do honor to anyone. Since you begged that you want the participation of the opposition, here is our offer, written by mail. It may seem naive, but we have considered that it is a process that does not belong to us, but to the Albanians.
You really want the opposition with all the nuances that the denominator has is to give seriousness to the substantial participation of the opposition. You will elect him with 84 votes, you are obliged to accept the positions of the opposition. “said Alibeaj
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
