[ad_1]
The CEC today approved the request of the Socialist Movement for Integration for the registration of the “House of Freedom” coalition as an electoral subject for the March 6 local by-elections.
Celibashi argued that the SMI’s request has a legal basis and the party is registered as an electoral subject, while rejecting the DP’s two requests for non-registration of the coalition.
The representative of PD and LSI clashed at the CEC regarding the request he submitted for registration.
The DP was the first to oppose the registration of the coalition, the DP representative in the CEC, Marash Logu listed in his reasoning two elements that legally made it impossible for the CEC to register the “House of Freedom” as a coalition.
The first was that the request for registration of the coalition was made out of time, as the SMI had not yet gained the status of electoral subject in the CEC, while the second is that in the coalition agreement and the request for registration, reference to the leading political party can be made with the DP led by Lulzim Basha, at the time when it is mentioned as the party “DPA-Coalition of Re-establishment”.
On the other hand, the representative of the SMI, Kaziaj, said that “All the necessary elements that the legislator requires for a coalition are listed, initials, initials and attached the agreement of the representatives of the coalition”
He spoke more politically, saying that he did not ask anyone to form a coalition with the DP, reminding the Assembly of December 18 with the number of delegates.
Excerpts from the discussion:
Kaziaj: The agreement is clear on what this coalition is made for. He points out that the statements of this character should be of interest to his own party. You are not legitimized by this request. I want you to proceed with the registration of this coalition. I would advise you to stick to the legal argument in this matter.
log: I join your call to act as legal representative. It does no honor to Mr. Kaziaj to deal with the number of chairs and doors. As far as I am concerned, as far as I can I will refer only to the law and the electoral code. At the time the application for registration of the coalition was submitted, those who are part of the coalition had not yet been defined as electoral subjects. For us, at the time the request was submitted, they had not gained the status of an electoral subject. The second that is good for the DPA, in the agreement there is a clear reference to the DP. I inform you that the DPA, neither through its chairman, nor its representatives, has expressed the desire to be part of a coalition. Let alone political statements.
Kaziaj: I do not agree with Mr. Logu, as he made a political statement again. We are the legal representatives of some political entities. You are making the debate focused on this session by clinging to the initials or initials of a subject we have introduced into coalition relations. This is not the moment for this debate. The legislator is clear in the Electoral Code.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
