[ad_1]
Based on these findings, we addressed the Institute of Food Safety and Veterinary with a request to conduct some concrete analysis for certain PMVs. The response we received was negative. In another letter, ISUV informs us that in the last 10 years, 983 drugs have been analyzed in the Veterinary Control Laboratory.
We requested authorization to follow closely at least one routine analysis procedure of active principles, but again the request was not accepted. A KLSH report that Top Story has in its entirety, underlines a very serious detail about which no one has spoken and held responsibility until today. In the years 2018-2019 the laboratory for the analysis of Agricultural Medicinal Products did not function. This raises strong doubts even for the veterinary medicine laboratory.
“What I want to emphasize has become a trend precisely from the information I have, we do not have a laboratory specified to control the active principle of a drug, so a drug that we use in veterinary medicine, it is a costly laboratory. My suggestion is to be only a human and veterinary laboratory where the active principles are the same, we do not have to have two laboratories “said Dritan Laçi, Professor of Veterinary Medicine.
“During our veterinary practice we encounter problems, during the use of medications because there are many preparations in circulation that say something else on the label and have other active ingredients,” said Ervin Resuli, Veterinarian.
“The letters are well written, but there is no control, we close our eyes to pass the first step and the first benefit, without thinking about tomorrow. For the generations to come … “said Zihni Sula, Professor of Toxicology.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link