[ad_1]
24 hours before the Assembly, at the request of the opposition to consider the fate of her mandate as an MP, Minister Olta Xhaçka broke the silence. She initially defended not only her husband but also her political family by dismissing allegations of conflict of interest.
“This investment is a private investment, on a private plot, by a private investor. Not a single penny was used from public funds and not a single meter of public property land for the construction of this hotel. “I have not violated any law, neither I, nor my husband, nor the government, nor the prime minister and no one.”
From the rostrum of Parliament, the foreign policy chief showed what her businessman husband has gained as a strategic investor in the south of the country.
“Legal security, to have priority in concluding the annual contract with the municipality to put lounges in front of the hotel, against payment. In short, as a strategic investor, which is investing millions, which will employ dozens of employees, which will bring tourists and generate economy and income for that area and beyond, has gained the right to put sunbeds on the beach . The law recognizes this right, Edi Rama did not give it to him, much less the minister’s wife “.
The mandate of the socialist risks going to the Constitutional Court, but for the minister this opposition movement is zero, remembering that the court has spoken about similar cases before.
“That I am not in a conflict of interest, this is what the law says,” said the Constitutional Court, which at no point has stopped the families of MPs or ministers from doing business. “
The opposition attacked the minister again, but she refused to reply to the Democrats Gazment Bardhi and Agron Shehaj, initiators of two different demands that have the same essence: the removal of the mandate of MP Olta Xhaçka.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
