[ad_1]
Lawyer Plarent Ndreca has called wrong the way the opposition acted in the process of electing the new president.
Invited tonight in “Top Story” with Sokol Balla, Ndreca said that the opposition saw it as a process that depended on the majority, and this was a mistake because it was actually dependent on its behavior.
He said the opposition should have chosen an exposing name and the majority would lose ‘shares’ if it were down. In these conditions, the lawyer said that it is no wonder that the majority will elect the new head of state.
“The constitution itself gives him the right, there is no need for the majority to give it. This is the mistake that the opposition makes, they saw it as a process dependent on the majority, but it was dependent on the behavior of the opposition and the majority has its constitutional behavior and takes its responsibilities. Whatever kind of game the majority has played, the opposition does not have to be part of it, but for the good of the country. In three rounds the majority does not have the numbers, the opposition must be active, but the majority has the numbers, it has to decide and this is not surprising. It is not a biblical prediction that the majority will choose if the opposition does not exercise its rights. If the opposition would have issued a truly exposing and risky name if it had been rejected. Even if he were to fall, he would lose stock arm that would knock him down. The passive being turns the routine process, then the majority will choose not to leave it without a president. “Even if he is elected on Saturday, it does not mean that he must be in the majority.”said Ndreca.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
