The bailiff and the ACA confiscated the creditor’s property even though it had a court decision

She tells reporters that after she divorced her husband by court decision, the property was proportional. A shop was left in her name, while the house that had the greatest value was decided to pass in the name of her ex-husband, but after the latter gave the amount of 27 million old lek to Mrs. Qanie.

The shop was registered in the name of the lady while the house was in the name of both until the moment of payment of the money by the ex-husband. This court decision Mrs. Qanie handed it over to the Vlora Bailiff’s Office in May 2020 and paid 1 million 200 thousand old lekë for the enforcement actions. She asked the bailiff to place a seizure on the property so that she would not be alienated, but the bailiff did not. The ex-husband took advantage of this by going to ASHK and alienating the house that was in the name of both by returning it in his name without repaying the amount of 27 million according to the court decision. In August the owner registered the property in the name of in September, with a deed of donation to the notary, he donated the property to his father. Meanwhile, Mrs. Qanie says that in addition to having problems with her food pension, she is the head of the family and has been left homeless.

The central ACA during the inspection found irregularities taking measures for the employee, but the citizen was not given a solution and she is redirected to the court.

The citizen meets the bailiff who justifies himself by saying that he did not think that the property could be alienated. The citizen also goes to the notary who blames the bailiff for not blocking the property. As for the alienation of the property, the notary says that I found it free property and the act of donation could be done normally. Fiks journalists go to meet the bailiff Fitim Kociaj who is also the head of the Vlora Bailiff. had the possibility of alienation.

He also says that those responsible should go before the law and that a lawsuit has been filed against the ACA and the invalidity of the notary act. Journalists ask him why the card was requested by the ACA in December when the issue with him was in May? He says that despite not having an official document, the lady was asked to pay for the auction, but she did not do it. Fiks journalists go to the Vlora Cadastre. The director communicates to them through the guard that they have to go next week as the situation is aggravated by covid 19. Despite the fact that measures were taken for the employees, nothing is being done for the lady. Why is inaccuracy not regulated at the same time as the citizen is given the right? Fiks journalists also went to the central cadastre directorate, from which they did not receive a response.