[ad_1]
“First of all, I want to clarify that contrary to what has been reported, the Court of Appeals has not decided to overturn this decision. Only the possibility for the submitted complaint to become part of the file to go to the Appeal was accepted.
In the first place the complaint does not meet any of the criteria set out in the law. Nor is it a legitimate determinant of any party. The control exercised by the court in this case is not substantial, but should have been only a formal control. In this case, according to the legal dispositions, the court should have decided to reject or reject this appeal. The same standard was maintained by the same judge, the request that Rithemelimi presented, he did not respond and left in silence. The court has consolidated the practice of rejecting the appeal by a party, it is not that it is giving life to an unknown jurisprudence. In the case of the association of municipalities, it has decided that the requests of the parties that are not even parties are taken into consideration and no longer considered. We have presented this and other decisions to the judge. “
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
