[ad_1]
The National Information Society Agency is the regulatory, coordinating and responsible authority for state records. All technical security of state institutions, infrastructure, networking and care is centralized to the Agency which in itself is subordinated to the Council of Ministers. If the computer platforms are broken or there is interference, it is this institution which should be held responsible.
It is noteworthy that in the payroll made public, IT experts Eni Qirjako and Andi Agaraj are employees of the National Agency for Information Society as a high level specialist. It is unclear why the investigative file states that they work in taxes. What is known is the fact that NAIS experts are attached to the institutions as responsible for computer systems.
“With the information I have in this office, data on the interests of a group of interests outside the ANA have been collected and used. “The fact that someone from this working group is coming out today has given way to the security or relationship they had before and I am extracting this data little by little.”
It is clear that payroll databases have come out of the same hand. Investigations are still underway to find out if these same people are responsible for extracting the license plate data. Even for the patronage case, it is exactly the data provided by these citizens that have been used.
As we found out from the wiretaps between Qirjako and Agaraj, the conversations between them for data security started in February 2021 and continued during April, ie the month of the campaign.
“I did a check with the exel file that came out with the April salaries. If the second page of the file we had another list of personal data and we had a serial number on the left, which is exactly the ordinal number of the list of patronage that came out in early April. “Technically, I think it’s the same list and the same hand that has put them together,” said IT expert Gent Progni.
If we take a concrete example, the serial number 365222 in the list of patronage workers, it matches as a number and person in the other list of telephone numbers that was recently published. What reinforces the suspicion is the fact that the person’s name has the same spelling error in both the patronage and phone number lists.
Now let’s look at another random number where spelling mistakes are found. Specifically, the serial number 619 in the document of the patronage workers. If you face the same number in the payroll again the person matches.
According to verifications performed by Top Story, all ordinal numbers match. Also, the spelling mistakes are the same which shows that the information used are exactly the databases that were stolen by the citizen Eni Qirjako.
“What logically should have happened should have happened immediately, not the request for sequestration of the portal that exposed the scandal, but should have gone to seize the databases of state servers that have this data,” said Gert Shella, executive director of INFOÇIP.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
