[ad_1]
Expectations for the anti-corruption court and the SPAK continue to be high, but with vacancies in both, it seems that judges and prosecutors are more afraid of vetting than of the hot files that await them.
While the SPAK is dominated by men, the opposite happens in the Special Court, where the vast majority of judges who wear the tunic to rule against the corrupt and organized crime are women. Despite the competition opened by the HJC, it is understood that male judges are not interested in the Special Court.
The Special Court that decides on SPAK investigations was constituted in 2019, but despite the time that has passed, the number of judges required by law has not been met. While from what is understood by the judges in office, out of 15 of them both of the first instance and of the Special Appeal, 11 are female judges and four men.
“In fact, this is a question that requires preparation and done so, I suddenly do not know how much I can answer, as it is an issue that needs study. But the first thought that comes to me is that women in the magistracy are more and more studious. “Although for me, everyone who wears the tunic is a judge and they are not divided into men and women, but into judges who decide”, says Saida Dollani, judge for the media.
Both courts currently lack 12 judges.
“I say that the vetting process has also influenced this steppe, because it is a criterion to be promoted in a career in this court”, says Dollani.
In the SPAK should be appointed 3 more to complete the quota of 20 special prosecutors.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
