[ad_1]
The scandal started on April 11, 2021, at the height of the election campaign. Then a document titled “Data-Tirana” was distributed massively where the data for 910061 citizens were located.
A database that had emerged from the electoral offices of the socialist party. The material had 20 sections which included political preferences, voting census in the 2013 elections, voting information and various comments on whether they were employed in state institutions or were favored for various applications. A structure called “patronageists” where 9127 political activists of the pink headquarters were identified.
“It was about data that the citizens claimed in front of the camera, were given exclusively to the official entity that had asked for the effect of certificates,” said Gert Shella, executive director of INFOÇIP.
Reactions were harsh from the opposition and public opinion that raised suspicions of blackmail as part of the election campaign. Referring to the materials of the prosecution that Top Story has at its disposal, SPAK initially initiated the actions for the suspected act of electoral corruption but then reclassified it to the act of unauthorized computer entry.
It does not appear that any concrete corruptive action in the electoral field was born or came to life, as a result of the data that are reflected in the above-mentioned, published database. On the contrary, from the totality of complaints that have arrived in the framework of this criminal proceeding, the concern that has characterized this phenomenon has to do with the dissemination of personal data.
“If the administration’s resources are used for electoral gain, this is a crime and is punishable only by bribe, if data are used for electoral purposes, paradoxically, the legislation still has no provision,” said Gert Shella, executive director of INFOÇIP.
There are 161 citizens who have made denunciations to the prosecutor’s office for the dissemination of personal data which have been joined in the proceedings initiated mainly by law enforcement agencies. One of the complainants made available to prosecutors a message that reached him on the phone inviting him to vote for a socialist candidate.
The complainant says that he had to open an account in E-Albania no later than 2 months before the elections where he submitted his phone number. He says that apart from his family, no one else has his phone number.
In fact, the problem was not the existence of the patronage army, but the use of citizens’ personal data. Data found in state computer systems such as personal number, apartment code and telephone number, etc.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
