[ad_1]
The law on the hunting moratorium is enforced by the Ministry of Environment, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Minister of Finance, the National Agency for Protected Areas and the State Inspectorate of Environment and Forestry.
With the changes made to the Criminal Code in 2019, it would find a place in environmental crime, specifically quarantine or moratorium on wildlife.
Article 202 of the Criminal Code punishes with a fine or imprisonment of up to seven years, the damage to protected species of wild flora and fauna.
This includes killing, destroying, possessing, taking specimens of protected species of wild flora and fauna.
Trade in specimens of protected species of wild flora and fauna or parts or by-products thereof is punishable by a fine or up to three years of imprisonment.
The data of the State Police provided by Top Story, show that 205 cases have been referred to the Prosecutor’s Office against 213 citizens related to the practice of illegal hunting in the years 2014-2020.
221 cases were referred to the Prosecutor’s Office according to the laws and articles related to the practice of illegal hunting in the years 2014-2020.
32 cases for hunters caught in flagrante delicto shooting during the period the moratorium was in force.
261 cases have been referred to the Prosecutor’s Office for persons who have been found to be engaged in illegal hunting, since 2014.
But representatives of civil society organizations in environmental protection think that these figures do not reflect reality.
There are several reasons, they explain, because when we talk about environmental crime it is a new term. Even the changes in the criminal code to be called environmental crime are late. Many things that were previously considered normal now constitute environmental offenses or crime.
Said in this context, the experience of the institutions gained is absolutely very limited. Both the law of the moratorium and the Criminal Code stipulate the State Police to deal with the implementation of the moratorium on hunting, to prevent or identify various criminal offenses.
The most egregious cases reported by environmental associations are the case of large mammals held captive in the private zoo in Fier. And no later than December 2020, a 67-year-old man in Tirana was caught by police after killing a sorrel near the Artificial Lake in Tirana. Genci Bermema had gone hunting and when he was stopped by the police, he had in his hand the hunting rifle and the sorkadhen that he had killed.
“Brut.nature”, digital platform with an international audience, has published the case of wildlife trade in Albania, denounced by Four Paus International and PPNEA
“Brut. Nature ”emphasizes that in Albania there is a lack of continuous monitoring and implementation of the law by state authorities, further stating that a legal act is needed which specifies the role of inspectorates in relation to environmental crimes, as well as strengthening local governments in managing the situation. .
The video illustrates brown bears, monkeys, foxes, and many other species that have been mistreated and used as a means of advertising for businesses. Still further, wildlife is also serving as a staple of restaurant menus, which regularly advertise their exotic dishes.
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link
