[ad_1]
The system lacks almost half of the judges. In the Supreme Court there are only 9 members out of 19 who should be.
The Constitutional Court has 7 out of 9 members, the Administrative Court of Appeal has 5 of the 13 judges it should have. The most serious situation is in the Courts of Appeal in the country where in total there are only 31 judges out of 78 who should be.
In this situation, there is an unequal distribution of issues. This is seen as the main argument by the working group that concludes that by merging the courts, the number of cases can be distributed equally. The proposal is seen as a solution to speed up review time. In the years 2018-2020 in the courts of first instance went about 303 thousand cases. If this figure is proportional to the number of judges to be in office, it is up to each magistrate to review 429 files a year.
“The most urgent issue today is how to fill the vacancies that have been created to answer the standard number of cases that a judge should have and then move on to specialization.“, Said Erida Skëndaj, Albanian Helsinki Committee
“Courts have a lot of work but they do not have judges and not the other way around, and come on in writing. Logically we have to find solutions how to turn the judiciary“, Said Gerti Shella, Executive Director INFOÇIP
“Now the problem is simple, based on all acts, all citizens should have equal access to court. In these conditions, if a judge will have 300-400 cases, it is calculated that all judges have an equal number, this damages the citizens’ right to access because it removes the court from them “, said Anton Kosteri, President of the Shkodra Bar Association
“The solution would be to increase the number of judges rather than unite the courts. Every citizen everywhere should have access to the system“, Said Redi Ramaj, lawyer
top channel
[ad_2]
Source link